AI/ML Product Security Audit
An AI/ML Product Security Audit ensures that
artificial intelligence and machine learning systems are developed, deployed,
and maintained securely. It focuses not only on traditional application and
infrastructure security but also on unique AI/ML risks like model poisoning,
data leakage, adversarial inputs, and ethical concerns such as bias and
explainability.
📋 AI/ML Product Security
Audit – Table Format
# |
Audit Item |
Control Description |
Audit Method / Tool |
Risk Level |
Recommendation |
1 |
Model Input Validation |
Ensure inputs to the ML model are sanitized and validated |
Review code, apply fuzz testing |
High |
Implement strict input validation and preprocessing |
2 |
Adversarial Input Protection |
Assess resistance to adversarial attacks (e.g., FGSM,
DeepFool) |
Test using adversarial ML frameworks |
High |
Train with adversarial samples, apply input noise or
detection layers |
3 |
Training Data Integrity |
Ensure training data is accurate, relevant, and untainted |
Review data lineage, perform statistical analysis |
High |
Validate sources and clean datasets regularly |
4 |
Model Poisoning Defense |
Prevent and detect poisoned or manipulated training data |
Inspect for data anomalies |
High |
Use data provenance and anomaly detection |
5 |
Access Control to Models |
Restrict access to model files, APIs, and training data |
Review IAM, API keys, and model storage ACLs |
High |
Implement RBAC, MFA, and API authentication |
6 |
Model Explainability |
Evaluate if model outputs can be explained and audited
(e.g., SHAP, LIME) |
Use explainability tools |
Medium |
Integrate explainability layers for regulated sectors |
7 |
Bias and Fairness Analysis |
Assess and mitigate model bias in data and decision-making |
Run fairness audits (e.g., Equalized Odds, DemParity) |
High |
Retrain with balanced datasets and apply bias-mitigation
algorithms |
8 |
Model Version Control |
Ensure models are versioned, traceable, and immutable
after deployment |
Review ML Ops platform (e.g., MLflow, DVC) |
Medium |
Use model registries and secure CI/CD pipelines |
9 |
Secure Model Deployment |
Ensure models are deployed securely (e.g., containerized,
signed, isolated) |
Review deployment pipeline and runtime environment |
High |
Use signed containers and isolate inference environments |
10 |
API and Endpoint Security |
Ensure model endpoints are protected from abuse (e.g.,
DDoS, scraping) |
Review API Gateway and WAF configurations |
High |
Rate-limit, authenticate, and monitor all inference
endpoints |
11 |
Inference Data Privacy |
Ensure user data sent for inference is protected (at rest
and in transit) |
Check for HTTPS, encryption settings |
High |
Use TLS, encrypt inference logs and outputs |
12 |
Logging and Monitoring |
Enable logging for access, model use, drift, and anomalies |
Review logging pipeline and retention |
Medium |
Centralize logs, monitor usage and performance in
real-time |
13 |
Model Drift Detection |
Monitor for statistical drift that may reduce model
accuracy or fairness |
Use monitoring tools (e.g., Alibi Detect, WhyLabs) |
Medium |
Set alerts and retrain models when drift is detected |
14 |
Confidential Computing |
Protect model execution with hardware-based isolation
(e.g., Intel SGX, AWS Nitro) |
Review hosting infrastructure |
Medium |
Use TEE for sensitive models and data |
15 |
Data Minimization & Retention |
Ensure minimal data is collected and retained for only
necessary durations |
Review data collection and retention policies |
High |
Apply anonymization and retention policies |
16 |
Ethical Use & Consent |
Confirm informed consent for training/inference using
personal data |
Review terms of service, consent forms |
Medium |
Ensure compliance with GDPR, HIPAA, PDPB |
17 |
Model Reproducibility |
Ensure ability to reproduce model results for auditing
purposes |
Check code, data, and environment tracking |
Medium |
Automate pipeline with reproducibility artifacts |
18 |
Third-Party AI Service Audit |
Ensure external AI services (e.g., SaaS APIs) meet
security/compliance standards |
Vendor assessment |
High |
Use certified, compliant providers and review SLAs |
19 |
Intellectual Property Protection |
Prevent theft or reverse engineering of proprietary models |
Test for model extraction attacks |
High |
Use output obfuscation, watermarking, and rate limiting |
20 |
Regulatory Compliance Mapping |
Align model development and use with standards (e.g., ISO
23894, NIST AI RMF) |
Map controls and documentation |
High |
Perform regular audits and gap assessments |
🛠️ Recommended Tools for
AI/ML Security Audits
Tool |
Use Case |
IBM Adversarial Robustness Toolbox |
Test and defend against adversarial attacks |
Alibi Detect |
Detect data drift, outliers, adversarial examples |
MLflow / DVC |
Model versioning and experiment tracking |
OpenMined |
Privacy-preserving AI frameworks (e.g., federated
learning) |
SHAP / LIME |
Model explainability and interpretability |
WhyLabs |
Monitoring for ML models in production |
Snyk / SonarQube |
Secure code and dependency scans |
OWASP AI Security Top 10 |
Framework for identifying common AI security risks |
Nessus / Qualys |
General system vulnerability scanners |
📄 Deliverables from an
AI/ML Security Audit
Deliverable |
Description |
AI/ML Security Audit Report |
Summary of vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and risk
exposure |
Threat Model and Risk Assessment |
Threat identification and prioritization based on AI risk
scenarios |
Remediation Plan |
Recommended fixes, timelines, and ownership |
Bias & Fairness Analysis |
Assessment of ethical AI compliance (e.g.,
non-discrimination) |
Compliance Mapping Report |
Mapping against GDPR, ISO 27001, NIST AI RMF, etc. |
Model and Pipeline Review |
Evaluation of training, deployment, and inference
workflows |
Security Checklist |
Baseline controls checklist for ongoing AI/ML development |
🔐 Compliance Frameworks
& Standards
Standard |
Relevance to AI/ML |
ISO/IEC 23894:2023 |
AI risk management framework |
NIST AI RMF |
NIST AI Risk Management Framework |
EU AI Act (Proposed) |
Risk-based classification of AI systems (High-risk, etc.) |
OECD AI Principles |
Ethical guidelines for trustworthy AI |
GDPR / PDPB |
Data privacy in AI models |
HIPAA |
AI-based health diagnostics and data privacy |
Would you like help performing an AI product threat model,
creating a secure ML pipeline, or aligning with upcoming regulations like the EU
AI Act?
Comments
Post a Comment